Blog

2016(8)
2015(5)
2014(8)
2013(9)
2012(14)
2011(25)

Employment needs a new model

There are three big things going on that mean work is different to the "good old days.
  1. I was told many times as my kids were growing that they would be doing jobs that do not exist today;
  2. Businesses everywhere are having to make significant change constantly if they are to stay afloat - we are in a global market;
  3. Technology is so much a part of our lives that the rules of what is possible is constantly up for discussion.  If you doubt me go look at smart materials, 3d printing, nano technology or you smart phone.
  4. More people have many jobs and/or are based at home;

Given all that it amazed me to hear the postal workers union rep stating that the NZ government was failing posties by not giving them jobs for life.   Their job for the last five years should have been to have those 2,000 posties retrained, re skilled and redeployed so the news never had to happen.  What is the root cause of an environment where there is such a strong systemic failure?

It is human to think the person who arrives in a crisis is on your side.  But actually all good parents know that sometimes being on your kids side is about guiding them much earlier so the crisis does not happen.

The symptoms I see suggest that the best interest of the worker was forgotten/lost long ago:
  • one of the biggest hurdles to health and safety adoption is staff engagement (yes management has a lot of responsibility to shoulder but actually if the unions were proactive the unionised shops should have awesome engagement not the sullen compliance that means employers are at huge financial risk;
  • one of the oft stated issue in NZ is weak management. Smart employee advocates would be supporting the owners to have well trained effective management processes that work in NZ and provide an effective and respected leadership and direction.  We tend to see an us and them approach; 
  • a major constraint to lean processes (an idea from the 1960s, well before that actually but lets not go there) is employee engagement.  The biggest investment and risk to roll-out employees;   
  • the significant cost of managing a workforce is the litigation risk of getting rid of poor performers.  The reason for that uncertainty is an employment law framework that assumes every employee is good unless proven otherwise - which is a huge drain on productivity and outside the skill set of most;
  • NZ has an inherent growth rate in productivity of 2%  the OECD is about 4%.  Guess who will win this race.  What focus are the unions having on increasing productivity?  The headlines suggest the union advocates see productivity as evil!  Our labour market is has a very inflexible price.  It is better to be unemployed that paid a little.  That means on the world stage unless we can produce more in the same time (ie be more productive) we cannot compete.  
  • I'm going to stop there are just tons of points pouring out of my head and this is meant to be a blog not a rant (or is that the same thing?) 

So in my view employees should be looking for a new deal:
  • How often will I be retrained in the next 5 years?  
  • What are the productivity growth expectations on this firm and how will you achieve those.  What do I need to be good at to support that development  
  • If I request a change of process, protection or other H&S matter how will that be decided.  
  • What are you doing to make sure your managers are world class.  
  • What do we need to do so my hourly rate doubles over the next 5 years.
  • how much of your turnover is being applied to new technologies?

Sadly I am sure we will hear more headlines from union reps complaining that nasty employers are laying off staff and the government should be stopping it.  May be the press will call them on it..... yeah right.    

Blog

2016(8)
2015(5)
2014(8)
2013(9)
2012(14)
2011(25)